JUNG TURNED INSIDE OUT: Poems by Leslie Scalapino, Jean Valentine
Wesleyan University Press, 1999
$11.95, 94 pp.
The Cradle of the Real Life
Wesleyan University Press, 2000
$12.95, 75 pp.
“You can’t beat a stick,” writes Jean Valentine in her most recent
collection, which, according to the book’s back matter, “presents
experience as only imperfectly graspable.”
You could, of course, beat a stick.
But what good would it do you?
And what harm? This
is the kind of brilliant mistake that I love in poetry, and it’s also
what exposes the stupidity of the back matter:
anyone who’s ever hit their funny bone (or read a poem for that
matter) knows that language can’t help but present us with imperfect
versions of experience (which is to say a version of an experience that
is itself an experience). Language
is always a kind of knowledge, but knowledge isn’t all language. And
so good verse doesn’t tell us what is right or wrong in terms of what
is possible, but rather what is right or wrong in terms of our sense of
what is possible. The lack of reciprocity between language and knowledge
is what any decent poet must commit themselves to both working with and
enduring, and the sense of what is possible within and without these
works and this endurance is constantly changing lanes-not to mention
shape-which of course leads to new forms, new poetics.
But if this happens in due time (and I think it does), it does not
happen in New Time; the
hyperbolic back matter of Leslie Scalapino’s latest book doesn’t
begin to save these poems from confounding and disappointing at least
this reader. “Real events,” says the anonymous Wesleyan employee,
“occurring in real time, are transformed in the act of writing them as
perceived rather than interpreted.”
From the beginning, Language writing taught us that the
transcript is the transformation, but New
Time is simply perception ad
nauseum, a pointilist belaboring of pointlessness.
Jung once wrote that “[a]ny reaction to stimulus may be
casually explained; but the creative act, which is the absolute
antithesis of mere reaction, will for ever elude the human
has managed to turn Jung’s assertion inside-out by presenting us with
a book composed entirely of random (and, to be sure, mere) reactions,
which, far from being casually explainable, leave me completely
dumbfounded. These “small
jobs” do nothing but enervate. To
the rain forest is so
closed in-calls dropping-the trees the
same-one being depressed it doesn’t sustain it.
it doesn’t enhance-being-(or) depressed.
one would be taken away from oneself in not being
tinual change-dawn-land isn’t one-is land-living?
to redo the break, that’s dawn per se
To be sure, this is no brilliant mistake; rather, it reads like a
transcription of some sun-baked tourist’s musings.
To be surer, we are all guilty of such musings, but most of us
let our disposable cameras record these thought-pieces for us and
haven’t the time nor the desire to hoodwink a university press into
thinking us geniuses. Let’s
see what Valentine can do with fewer words:
Father I’m twenty
Like many of the poems in this book, this untitled lyric’s economy,
clarity and subject matter bring to mind the work of Lorine Niedecker,
who I think would have been driven insane by Scalapino’s uncrafted
ramblings. At other times
in The Cradle of Real Life, one is reminded of Paul Celan’s taut and
off the Atlantic
out toward strangeness
a breath on a coal
Valentine wastes no words; everything matters.
Scalapino somehow manages to waste even as she recycles:
everything is simply matter.
If language is poetry’s method of presentation, then I think it’s
safe to say that perfection isn’t poetry’s gift.
But we don’t need poetry to beat us over the head with this
fact any more than poetry needs anonymous blurb-age (which exists in
order to “sell” poems) to inflate its importance or sell it short. While its poems are certainly “more textures than
statements”-but what good poem was ever a statement?-The
Cradle of The Real Life, which is always careful enough to be both a
container of experience and a rewarding experience in itself, is a good
deal more than the summation of its parts would lead us to believe.
comments to firstname.lastname@example.org
first electronic copyright
all rights revert to authors
website comments to email@example.com